Randomly assign the requested number of reviewers to each item while keeping every reviewer within their workload capacity. Built for editors, grant teams, conference chairs, and review coordinators, this tool keeps reviewers, items, reviewers per item, and items per reviewer visible and shows the reviewer coverage report before you use it.
Designed to randomly assign the requested number of reviewers to each item while keeping every reviewer within their workload capacity, this tool applies reviewer assignment rules to reviewers, items, reviewers per item, and items per reviewer and presents the reviewer coverage report for review.
Assignment workflow
Randomly assign the requested number of reviewers to each item while keeping every reviewer within their workload capacity. Keep reviewers, items, reviewers per item, and items per reviewer visible while you assign two reviewers to each submission, then review the reviewer coverage report.
For this case, set reviewers, items, reviewers per item, and items per reviewer, then choose “Assign reviewers.” Check the reviewer coverage report before sharing or putting the result into use.
The Reviewer Assignment Generator result still needs organizer review. Assignments are random and do not compare expertise or conflicts. The tool does not provide file exchange or review collection.
Instructions
In Reviewer Assignment Generator, start with reviewers: add one reviewer name per line.
Review reviewers, items, reviewers per item, and items per reviewer before continuing. Together they define the current assignment task in Reviewer Assignment Generator.
Choose “Assign reviewers.” The tool applies reviewer assignment rules and displays the reviewer coverage report with any result notes.
Check the reviewer coverage report against this limit: assignments are random and do not compare expertise or conflicts. If this Reviewer Assignment Generator result fits the task, copy it and download a CSV.
Troubleshooting
When: Reviewer Assignment Generator has no usable reviewers, or an entry does not follow the format shown by that field.
Why: The tool needs valid reviewers, items, reviewers per item, and items per reviewer to produce the reviewer coverage report.
Try: In Reviewer Assignment Generator, add one reviewer name per line; then assign reviewers again.
When: Assignments are random and do not compare expertise or conflicts.
Why: The tool evaluates reviewers, items, reviewers per item, and items per reviewer, but it cannot assess context outside those controls.
Try: Check the reviewer coverage report against this additional limit: the tool does not provide file exchange or review collection. Revise the visible settings in Reviewer Assignment Generator when needed.
Trust
The tool applies reviewer assignment rules only to reviewers, items, reviewers per item, and items per reviewer. Review those settings with the reviewer coverage report; the tool does not provide file exchange or review collection.
The active inputs and reviewer coverage report remain with the open task. Random 42 does not save Reviewer Assignment Generator work as an online project; refreshing or closing the tool clears that active work.
Boundaries
Assignments are random and do not compare expertise or conflicts.
FAQ
For Reviewer Assignment Generator, add one reviewer name per line; each additional control explains the value or rule it accepts.
It applies reviewer assignment rules to reviewers, items, reviewers per item, and items per reviewer, then displays the reviewer coverage report with any result notes.
Review the reviewer coverage report before every use. Assignments are random and do not compare expertise or conflicts. The tool does not provide file exchange or review collection.
No. Reviewer Assignment Generator keeps its active inputs and reviewer coverage report with the open task instead of creating a saved online project.
Keep exploring